Svetlana Matsevich, Irina Korenetskaya, Anna Kuzmichenko

Last modified: 24.02.2020


The article focuses on the relevant problem of finding new methods in theory and practice of teaching foreign languages and attempts an interdisciplinary research of conceptual metaphors both as a phenomenon of linguistics and English-language training. The authors view the research novelty in considering conceptual metaphors of educational discourse as one of the means of teaching students English speech patterns. The research aim is to identify basic conceptual metaphors of educational discourse and describe the algorithm of using them in teaching English at universities. The primary methods of the study are conceptual-taxonomic analysis and the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP). The materials of the study include the articles of the English-language educational discourse and topical lectures on Education, Communication, Science and Society at TED Talks platform. The main research results present conceptual metaphor classification and its possible use as the means of teaching English speech patterns. The basic mechanism of learning new English speech patterns through conceptual metaphors suggests the implementation of cognitive-communicative approach. The results of the research are addressed to master and post-graduate students when learning English in professional sphere of education sciences.



cognitive-communicative approach; conceptual metaphor; conceptual-taxonomic analysis; educational discourse; English-language training; higher education; speech pattern


Altman, I. (1996). Higher Education and Psychology in the Millennium. American Psychologist, 51, 4, 371-378.

Andreou, G., & Galantomos, L. (2008). Teaching idioms in a foreign language context: preliminary comments on factors determining Greek idiom instruction., 15, 7–26.

Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language. New York: Routledge.

Brown, B. (2010). The power of vulnerability. Retrieved from:

Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671-690.

De Botton, A. (2009). A kinder, gentler, philosophy of success. Retrieved from:

De Grey, A. (2005). A roadmap to end aging. Retrieved from:

Fisher, H. (2006). Why we love, why we cheat. Retrieved from:

Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gilbert, E. (2009). Your elusive creative genius. Retrieved from:

Hoffman, G. (2013). Robots with “soul”. Retrieved from:

Kozhina, M. N. (1993). Stilistika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Prosveshhenie.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408-429.

Lodatko, E. A. (2013). Kognitivnye metafory i klasterizacija v pedagogicheskom modelirovanii. Vektor nauki TGU. Pedagogika i psihologija, 3, 146–150.

Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A Method for IdentifyingMetaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.

Robinson, K. (2006). Do schools kill creativity. Retrieved from:

Schwartz, B. (2006). The paradox of choice. Retrieved from:

Telija, V.N. (1988). Metaforizacija i ee rol' v sozdanii jazykovoj kartiny mira. Rol' chelovecheskogo faktora v jazyke: Jazyk i kartina mira. Moskva: Nauka, 173–205.

Vinogradov, V.V. (1997). Osnovnye tipy leksicheskih znachenij slova. Izbrannye trudy. Leksikologija i leksikografija. Moskva: Nauka, 162–189.